Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > There can be a change in time, 1 year of innovative technologies Fedora users are happy, you are grumbling that your "stable" setup breaks each other day... > and > then only critical updates, ... and now you are happy, while Fedora users leave disappointed that there is no new technology... and next cycle is a _huge_ jump, and your grumbling can only get worse. > if fedora maintainers are volunteering to > keep on doing critical updates. They aren't. It is enough of a chore to track upstream, to track upstream _and_ backport fixes is too much to ask. And most fun comes to your average geek from playing with the newest, shiniest toy around... > And I even think that 6 months of > innovative technologies, 6 months with a slowdown in updates, only > important updates, on user demand and then only critical fixes as long > as a maintainer is doing them would even be better. Tell you what, this is /exactly/ (well, almost) what you'd get following CentOS or RHEL, only /without/ screwing up Fedora. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
