On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:17:01PM -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: >> I know about users for which Centos/RHEL is not right because it is too >> old, fedora would suit them, if they had not to upgrade after one year. >> Currently I have to propose them to install ubuntu, because there is >> nothing in the fedora/RHEL market that suits them. Not enough power user >> for fedora updates every year, need too recent stuff for RHEL. Another >> category who be those who want to use a controlled set of next >> technology preview in production environment and are willing to do some >> testing and help with bugs, hence would have choosen fedora, but cannot >> if they have to update each year. > >On this point, I know I tend to be pretty liberal with my personal >machines (and tend to keep them at the latest !rawhide), but for my >work laptop, while I run Fedora for a variety of reasons, I tend to be >pretty conservative and upgrade to the latest only when forced to by >distro EOL or some other compelling reason. A LTS plan would make >sense for reasonable situations like this. No, it wouldn't. (I know you know that I know what you know so you should know what I know and I know there are other options and I know that you know that.) josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
