Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



| From: Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

| Yes, but the kind of patches that should be sent upstream are not the
| ones resulting in 300 busted packages from a libtool upgrade.  We're
| talking about patches applied by a specfile build.

Could you characterize the problems that cause 300 busted packages?

Naive questions:

- Might a reasonable patch to libtool 2.2 fix a lot of these problems?
  (And no, I don't mean "patch it back to 2.1.")

- Would it make sense to allow multiple versions of libtools co-exist
  on a system and allow a .spec declaration of some kind specify which
  to use?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux