Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

> Why do we need to guarantee any more than active Fedora releases 
> guarantee?  Forget backporting.  Just upgrade the package.  Take it 
> from the current Fedora and rebuild it if necessary.

What is the difference from regular Fedora then, if you propose just
dumping new packages into the "stable" release?

> I've already said my piece on the timeline.  6-7 months to start out.  
> If that works, we can talk about extending it.

Nope. If anything, pick a Fedora release and propose to extend its life for
a year (less makes very little sense). Then move to the one EOL at that
point, etc.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux