Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel.seyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Patrice Dumas [12/10/2008 16:51] : > > Which work? Not shutting down builders and other infras for the EOL > > branches? > Not just not shutting them down but actively maintaining them, which > would require more work than maintaining the non-EOL branches. I fail to see what the big job is here, but whatever. > I'm sorry but, until there's a community committed to actually doing > the work, Backporting fixes, handling bug reports, ... Note that here you _can't_ rely on upstream, they generally aren't interested in ancient versions, so this is /much/ more work than regular maintainership. > asking that infrastructure be created/adapted/maintained is an > unreasonable request, IMHO. Nodz. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
