On Sun October 12 2008, Les Mikesell wrote: > But the first question should be why a separate community is necessary. > Why is it not possible for one of fedora's goals to be to provide a > clean transition to RHEL or Centos at the end of certain development > cycles, at which point EPEL/Rpmfusion, etc. would be unnecessary as > separate entities since that fedora cycle's repository would be directly > usable as-is and would simply need to be maintained instead of the > various 3rd party versions that have been necessary to fill this void? You only need people to test this and document what needs to be done, like the yum upgrade SIG do. They document what is needed to run an upgrade without using anaconda from one Fedora release to another. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
