* Patrice Dumas [11/10/2008 00:59] : > > But within the fedora infrastructure, and with the fedora rules (unlike > fedora legacy that had different infrastructure and rules). What's so important about the fedora infrastructure that it is required to release updates past EOL ? The rules I can understand (even if I don't agree) but those can be replicated elsewhere. > As a side note, I think that in the end my project would certainly have > failed because I don't think that somebody would have stepped up to take > the big ones, like glibc, kernel, gcc but this would have been an > interesting test. But why didn't you try ? Your proposal sounded like a good idea (although I think you're right that not enough people are interested in it for it to be viable) and I think it's a shame that you didn't go ahead and implement it. Emmanuel -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
