On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:10:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: >> On 2008-10-10, 14:36 GMT, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: >> > What should do some previously RedHat-oriented enthusiast, when >> > all the area for application of his enthusiasm is some >> > "production environment"? Use RHEL/CentOS anywhere and Fedora >> > on his laptop only? But RHEL/CentOS is far from the "bleeding >> > edge", hence his enthusiasm just disappear... >> >> Think about that and repeat until you get it -- "distro is either >> bleeding-edge or stable; tercium non datur". > > It is a bit more complicated. A distro may begin its life bleeding edge > and become stable as time goes by, if it is still maintained. And a > stable distro may have parts that are bleeding-edge. This is not > necessarily easy to implement, but these scenarios certainly have > merits. > It can only become stable if you have people focus on things and not look at new stuff. And usually it requires resources that are expensive. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list