On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 07:50 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > The symlinks could even be a > separate package that people who didn't like the idea could remove. > They don't even need to depend on the target package - if the target > executable doesn't exist you aren't any worse off with the symlink than > without. Nothing would have to be rebuilt. Wouldn't work. You'd either have one package with a mess of dangling symlinks, or you'd need a symlink package per main package which would be as much or more work than just putting it in the main package to begin with.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
