On Sun, 05.10.08 20:46, Callum Lerwick (seg@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 20:29 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can I suggest that we consider adding new desktop users on a fresh > > install to pulse-rt by default? Or, put another way, does anyone think > > this is a particularly bad idea to be doing? > > Seems kind of pointless. If you're running low on CPU time, giving > pulseaudio priority will likely just result in client buffers running > dry anyway. Is there anything in place to take care of the priority > inversion problem? I know jackd/jacklib has some scheduling magic in > it... I am not sure you fully understand what real-time is about. It is not about giving some process "priority". That's what nice levels are for. Taking care of the "priority inversion problem"? There is no need for anyone to work around that, since we have PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT which PA has been using for quite a while (although we are mostly lock-less now). Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
