Re: pulse-rt by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 20:29 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can I suggest that we consider adding new desktop users on a fresh
> install to pulse-rt by default? Or, put another way, does anyone think
> this is a particularly bad idea to be doing?

Seems kind of pointless. If you're running low on CPU time, giving
pulseaudio priority will likely just result in client buffers running
dry anyway. Is there anything in place to take care of the priority
inversion problem? I know jackd/jacklib has some scheduling magic in
it...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux