Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Andrea Francia wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Jean-François Martin wrote:
Le dimanche 05 octobre 2008 à 01:36 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:10:06AM +0200, Jean-François Martin wrote:
Patrice Dumas had already done a partial review but don't want to
accept
the package because he think that executables are too generic (trash,
empty-trash, list-trash, restore-trash).
There is only trash that I find too generic...
If this command is really a problem can't we rename it "to-trash" for
example and add a file in doc, README.fedora that tell that for
packaging policy, we decide to change this command?
If renaming, please consider renaming them all to trash-* from the
current
*-trash.
What are the advantages of doing this?
Eh, thought it's obvious. One can type "trash" then use tab completion to see
what commands are available.
So the commands names could became:
- trashcan-put
- trashcan-empty
- trashcan-list
- trashcan-restore
My English is not so good, is the 'trashcan-put' a good choice?
--
Andrea Francia
http://andreafrancia.blogspot.com/2008/07/colinux-linux-dentro-windows.html
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
