Andrea Francia wrote: > Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >> Jean-François Martin wrote: >> >>> Le dimanche 05 octobre 2008 à 01:36 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit : >>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:10:06AM +0200, Jean-François Martin wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patrice Dumas had already done a partial review but don't want to >>>>> accept >>>>> the package because he think that executables are too generic (trash, >>>>> empty-trash, list-trash, restore-trash). >>>>> >>>> There is only trash that I find too generic... >>>> >>> If this command is really a problem can't we rename it "to-trash" for >>> example and add a file in doc, README.fedora that tell that for >>> packaging policy, we decide to change this command? >>> >> >> If renaming, please consider renaming them all to trash-* from the >> current >> *-trash. >> > What are the advantages of doing this? Eh, thought it's obvious. One can type "trash" then use tab completion to see what commands are available. For example when I install a package, say bittorrent, I naturally try "bittorrent<TAB><TAB>" before having to fall back to "rpm -ql bittorrent". It's simple namespacing too. behdad -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
