Re: NetworkManager vs. sysconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Yes it works with the latest updates till today.

On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 07:03 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I just installed a test server running F9. For once, I let
> NetworkManager run and left the install fairly alone. I statically
> configured a set of network settings in anaconda and those are present
> in the sysconfig network scripts. But NetworkManager decides it knows
> better and reconfigures the interface with DHCP anyway[0].
> 
> How is static interface config supposed to work with NetworkManager?
> Does this actually work in F9 today?
> 
> Jon.
> 
> [0] It actually does this even when you create a new "wired network" in
> NetworkManager with the correct config (so now you have it in two
> places) - it always wants to use its own "Auto eth0" regardless.
> 
> 
-- 
-----------------------------
Type bits /keyID Date User ID
pub 1024D/483B234C 2007/06/29 Deependra Singh Shekhawat (Fedora Project)
<jeevanullas@xxxxxxxxx>
Key fingerprint = ED45 62EA A4D7 53FB 44C7 774A D55B F3F0 483B 234C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux