Re: Bug in fedora 10 beta installer, but what package to file against?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug in fedora 10 beta installer, but what package to file against?
From: Christoph Höger <choeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:32:11 +0200
In-reply-to: <48E3D686.4000103@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Strangely, that breaks f10-beta installation completely for me, but why
not for every one else?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Bug in fedora 10 beta installer, but what package to file against?
  - From: Christoph Höger
- Re: Bug in fedora 10 beta installer, but what package to file against?
  - From: Rahul Sundaram

Prev by Date: Re: orphaning: glib, gtk+
Next by Date: Re: Running Xvfb during a package build -- good idea?
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in fedora 10 beta installer, but what package to file against?
Next by thread: Re: Bug in fedora 10 beta installer, but what package to file against?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux