On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 20:47 -0400, Michel Salim wrote: > 2008/9/23 James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > _Well done_ for bringing up rpm specfile groups which are obsolete, as > > I'm sure you know, and have been since before PK existed. > > I've been wondering -- is there any reason we don't get rpmbuild to > strip the group out of the package metadata when it generates a binary > RPM? > > Also, right now, rpmdev-newspec still creates a Group field, and even > prepopulates it for certain templates (e.g. libraries) it'll be maintained for compat reasons by it is no longer required to build a package as of the new rpm in rawhide, iirc. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list