Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 20:47 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
> 2008/9/23 James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >  _Well done_ for bringing up rpm specfile groups which are obsolete, as
> > I'm sure you know, and have been since before PK existed.
> 
> I've been wondering -- is there any reason we don't get rpmbuild to
> strip the group out of the package metadata when it generates a binary
> RPM?
> 
> Also, right now, rpmdev-newspec still creates a Group field, and even
> prepopulates it for certain templates (e.g. libraries)


it'll be maintained for compat reasons by it is no longer required to
build a package as of the new rpm in rawhide, iirc.

-sv


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux