Re: Should we mount with reltime as default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> FWIW, we don't carry that patch in the kernel any more.
>> Until upstream takes it, it's unlikely to come back.
>
> Ah, okay.  I looked at the kernel SRPM from rawhide, and the patch is
> still in there, but now I see in the spec that it is commented out.
>
> That would be something release-note worthy IMHO, since it is a change
> in behavior.
>
It makes sense to ship as close a kernel as possible to upstream -- in
this case, should the 'relatime' be introduced in the userspace
somewhere, though? Whichever utility (anaconda? hal?) touches
/etc/fstab should add 'relatime' appropriately.

Regards
,

-- 
miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/
IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux