Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 12:31 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> There's koji which
> touches every binary package, consumes and generates comps files.
> There's comps.xml which is the master store for this information right
> now.  There's repoview which provides a static interface to binary
> packages and comps on the gold repo but not yet updates -- if it is
> updated to work on updates, that will require bodhi to write out the files.

Kevin is right, it's mash that pulls comps out of cvs and 'makes' it and
uses it when generating repodata.  Mash is used during rawhide
production and during update repo generation.  When we make releases,
that uses pungi which consumes the comps data that mash generated and
merges in data from any other repo pungi is configured to use.  Then
pungi calls repoview to create data based on that merged comps.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux