Re: Tried Pulse Audio Again--No Good For A11y

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Poettering wrote:

And again, that's the way *I* think it makes the most sense.
If you haven't, give freenx/NX a try, floating your running session among displays at work, perhaps a wireless laptop, and pick them up from home with everything still running. And try it with several people sharing a machine. You might get used to the concept that your devices are really not that closely coupled. Or perhaps at least that your session isn't tied to the local console. X never intended it to be, but before freenx it wasn't that great remotely.

If you use a terminal client, then audio should be forwarded to
it.

That should be an option of course, perhaps the default choice even though it won't always work. If you are on a low bandwidth connection which works fine otherwise with NX, audio will be horrible. And your client may not have speakers - you may use many clients and good speakers are expensive and not portable.

> Audio should always be sent to the same machine that shows you the
video.

No, audio should always be sent to the device you choose. Guesswork is not a good thing.

Audio is part of the workplace, not the server.

Sometimes you would want an audio 'session' at your local device, sometimes you want to control the device on the server.

> From the
terminal client to the terminal server we send keyboard, mouse, audio
recording. From the terminal server to the terminal client we send
audio playback and screen contents.

I'm usually in the same room with the server, with the server connected to speakers intended for the whole room. But, I want to use the keyboard, mouse, and monitor from a nearby desktop box or float the display to a laptop - and when I pick up the session from home I don't want to attempt audio because of the bandwidth issue. Windows RDP connections attempt that but it's not pretty. The other point about NX as a client is that as far as the local machine is concerned, it is just one app running in one window, sort of like Xnest. You still have full access to all the other apps you want to run locally and it usually makes much more sense to run apps that require local audio locally than to forward them from some remote session.

Thinking of your computer as a single piece might make sense for someone who only has one, but does anyone really run fedora as their one and only computer?


--
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux