On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:36 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Quick question: should PackageKit depend on specspo? If you have the > > > specspo package installed then you get localised package names and > > > descriptions in the client applications, but dragging in specspo adds a > > > 6.9Mb download and 22.7Mb install dep. > > > > > > > Are there statistics about localization coverage in spec files? The > > bloat is even less desirable if only a handful of packages are going > > to benefit... > > If we want to be able to say with a straight face that we have an > end-user software installation application, then translated package > descriptions are pretty much a must. I don't think he was saying we shouldn't translate the pkgs - I think he was saying - specspo might just be a bad solution. for example - translating pkgs might best be served by translating the metadata in external files. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
