On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:03 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > The above really isn't possible. If you can recreate this then please > > file a bug. File the bug against rpm but please cc me on it. > > I wouldn't call it impossible, in fact I just managed to reproduce it with > this: You're right - I should have said 'shouldn't be possible'. Not isn't possible. > Without having yet looked deeper into it, it probably comes down to this > in rpmtsRun(): > /* > * XXX This has always been a hack, now mostly broken. > * If install failed, then we shouldn't erase. > */ > That's a nice fixme to have. :) > The hack in question is easily fooled, and so rpm is ultimately > responsible for the damage that results from yum code tracebacking in the > transaction callback. Rpm needs fixing (I'll go look into it right now), > but I'd suggest you go and comb through the ts callback code in yum - you > do NOT want it tracebacking, especially on "trivial" things like > sys.stdout operations failing. I'll look into it, thanks, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
