Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 19:05 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:

> The groups in comps.xml is used as meta-packages, there can be installed 
> and removed. just like yum groupinstall/groupremove.

 But that's not how groupinstall/groupremove works! Groups are _very_
different from meta-packages, for instance:

yum shell <<EOL
install @x-software-development
remove libXaw-devel
run
EOL

...at the end of this the 'X Software Development' group is not
installed.
 Why doesn't PK make it's "categories" the same as the yum backends
"groups"? I can't even see how to install the above group in PK.

 But then 0.3.2 is still doing utterly broken direct SQL calls, and
failing *sigh*.

-- 
James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux