On 9/21/08, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sep 7, 2008, "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > but it seems to be we are trying to be responsive in a way that > > makes sense from our project's point of view. > > Not trying to be flamy, but... [...] > - the removal of firmware upstream won't take place in linux-2.6.27, > which pretty much means kernel.org linux sources won't be stripped off > of non-Free bits in time for Fedora 10 As for the other options I don't know, but in my book, long-term actions, especially ones involving architectural changes, are still actions, even though they may not be ready in time for the very next release. So I don't think anyone should be blamed for them not being ready in the next release already. Christian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
