Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:53 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> On Tuesday, 16 September 2008 at 10:02, Matej Cepl wrote: >>> On 2008-09-15, 20:49 GMT, Doug Ledford wrote: >>>> I *could* do an srpm build to test ppc/ppc64 kernel builds, but >>>> it takes 30 minutes for a kernel srpm to upload to the build >>>> system from here (admittedly, I do this on my rhel kernel >>>> builds, I haven't been messing with Fedora kernels, but the >>>> point is valid regardless), so I commit, tag, build, fix, >>>> force-tag, build, fix, etc. >>> I don't want to immerse myself into this discussion (which >>> I haven't heard and read before), but this looks like bad >>> workaround around stupid problem. The problem here is IMHO that >>> koji is apparently not able to make a scratch build from untagged >>> (but commited) code. >> Wrong. You can use the tag "HEAD". > > Which doesn't help you if somebody else is concurrently working on the > same package and checks in things while you're waiting for your scratch > build. We could use "scratch-tags", but I find this a bit silly. IMO, > this is rather a point where using an SCM with a repo-wide revision-id > (instead of a per file one as used by CVS) would help. Who again was > looking for use-cases for different SCMs ;-)? > Actually... this is easily solved with tags that are generated by the system per build-request. If make build and make scratch-build automatically tagged, there wouldn't be any problem here. Instead of adding a make target for scratch-tags, take away make tag. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
