Re: Proposal: Better force-tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 10:16 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
> > Just removing stuff does not solve problems you have to implement a
> > better alternative first (and not rely on a worse one).
> 
> Since nothing stops the user from using TAG_OPTS=-F, it is ineffective 
> of us to remove force-tag.  How about an improved force-tag instead?
> 
> Make force-tag use koji to check if a build for that N-V-R is already 
> complete.  If it is complete, then refuse to tag again with the same N-V-R.

Ultimately nothing can stop the user from using cvs tag -F, so any
solution (including this one, which I like a lot) would have to be
server-side.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux