Re: Proposal: Better force-tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 13:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> 1) In what situations can things be broken with force-tags?  (ie: is it
> just when force tagging a successfully completed build?  Are completed
> failed builds okay?  What happens if a retag occurs on an in-progress
> build?)

This is maybe the point where prohibiting tagging with existing tags
makes sense: if there is an ongoing build of that tag or a successfully
finished one. From my armchair POV, it should be technically possible to
let CVS check for this and only prohibit tagging with a specific tag if
one of these conditions is given.

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux