On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:35 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Mar 16 septembre 2008 00:16, Les Mikesell a écrit : > > > > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:59 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> I regret having to state this, but I have been thinking Fedora has > >>> quit > >>> being a "general purpose distro" for quite a while. > >> > >> More to the point, the only large active group trying to move things > >> forward for Fedora are those that care about the Desktop experience, > >> ergo those are the directions Fedora is going in. It's a serve > >> yourself > >> kind of project, it is what you make of it. > > > > I don't think you can call it 'moving forward' if it breaks the things > > that have been the most useful about Linux so far. > > Nevertheless this group tries at least to do stuff, and the > counter-proposals are too often "do nothing". Generally speaking, not referring to your proposal, these counter proposals/critical remarks often are motivated from a) Don't break what's not broken b) A proposal is incomplete and misses to cover essential parts of a problem. c) A proposal is replacing one problem with another one. d) A proposal is naive, silly and dumb. In most cases, it's b) or c). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
