Re: Non responsive maintainer question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:59 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 13:52 +0100, Simon Andrews wrote:
> > A bug I reported back in February (#432767) has been sitting for some 
> > time with a couple of reported fixes, but no response from the maintainer.
> > 
> > I've looked at the non-responsive maintainer policy, but this seems to 
> > only apply in the case where you want to take over the package yourself 
> > - which I don't have the skills to do.
> > 
> > Is there a procedure for flagging up that a package maintainer seems to 
> > have gone AWOL whilst asking for anyone suitably qualified to take it over?
> 
> While we're doing that, I've kicked the package up to current to resolve
> the technical issue.
> 
> ~scruffy, the janitor

I thought the Janitor's name was Frazz[1]

-sv

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazz


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux