Re: Proposal: Better force-tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve Grubb wrote:
On Sunday 14 September 2008 10:16:03 Warren Togami wrote:
Just removing stuff does not solve problems you have to implement a
better alternative first (and not rely on a worse one).
Since nothing stops the user from using TAG_OPTS=-F, it is ineffective
of us to remove force-tag.  How about an improved force-tag instead?

Make force-tag use koji to check if a build for that N-V-R is already
complete.  If it is complete, then refuse to tag again with the same N-V-R.

Yes, this sounds exactly like what should have been done. We should not have disabled a feature that many people legitimately use until we had a tested solution that does not interrupt the work flow. This is needless arguing with no tangible benefits for anyone. I consider the srpm to be the canonical source of the build. That is the only granularity people can access via any mirror.

-Steve


The goal of preventing force-tag is to better guarantee that .src.rpm comtents match tags. We can achieve this by having force-tag fail if the buildsystem says that E:N-V-R was either already built or is currently building.

Could FESCO please consider this during the next meeting?

Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux