Re: make force-tag gone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve Grubb wrote:
> That is a horrible, UGLY kludge. I'm amazed that is our policy. It
> would have been far more helpful if someone who took away make
> force-tag would have made it echo a message to my screen saying that
> you need to do that.

I'm not arguing in favor of force-tag removal.  However, bumping the
release number like this is pretty much required if you have to
rebuild a package in an older branch, which can happen for various
reasons.  I don't see what's ugly or kludgy about ensuring that the
n-v-r remains less than what is in the devel branch.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Common sense is genius dressed in its working clothes.
    -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

Attachment: pgpUqkQFC4nQz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux