On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 22:13 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:52 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:33:27PM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > > > Dave Jones wrote: > > >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:32:59AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > >> > Le mercredi 10 septembre 2008 à 18:03 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit : > > >> > > > Now, I could bump the specfile and add "disable option foo on > > >> ppc" but if I did > > >> > > this, our changelogs would be absolutely enormous, and for very little gain. > > >> > > No one is asking you to add a new changelog line every time you > > >> make a > > >> > small change. You can bump the version in the changelog at the same time > > >> > you bump it elsewhere > > >> > > >> Regardless, it's still an extra file I have to edit for no apparent reason. > > > > > > So, did FeSCo meet and talk about this ? > > > > Yes. It was decided to leave the removal, and to also remove TAG_OPTS=-F. > > The decision was not unanimous. I believe the meeting summary will have > > links to the relevant discussion. > > OK, hopefully nobody will object if I always use this script before make > tag: > > REL=date +%s;sed s/@REL@/$REL/g spec.in >spec;cvs ci -m 'Bump' of course I forgot $() around date :) -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list