Re: make force-tag gone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 09 septembre 2008 à 12:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore a écrit :
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008 12:39:48 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jeffrey Ollie <jeff <at> ocjtech.us> writes:
> > > Refusing to bump a release number and re-tag because you don't want to
> > > "look stupid" is not a technical argument.
> >
> > Maybe, but it's a practical argument.
> >
> > > And before you ask, yes I've used force-tag before even though I know
> > > I shouldn't.  Removing it will help me be a better package manager.
> >
> > No, it will make you a worse packager, as your Release tags will get
> > incremented for no reason.
> >
> how does that make you a "worse packager"   it is clearly showing the work 
> that you are doing. 

rawhide kernel is at release 317 right now. A large portion of those 317
were mis-builds, oopsing kernels and other various fails (including
stupid typos).

Anyone dares saying our kernel people are abysmal packagers?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux