On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 15:28 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > Brian Pepple wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 14:19 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > >> This is especially problematic when Fedora Forum is our #1 preferred > >> place to direct end-users to for end-user support. fedora-list is a > >> dramatic pile of fail for this purpose. We also want to promote greater > >> participation of fedora developers on Fedora Forum in order to better > >> understand what are the common failures and to encourage users to follow > >> the proper processes to isolate the causes and test solutions. > > > > Should Fedora Forum be our #1 preferred place? I periodically drop in, > > and I have to agree with Richard that there is not much incentive for > > developers to invest time trying to answer questions there. > > > > Should it? I don't know. > > It just became the de facto preferred place with the lack of anything > better. Maybe the Board should re-evaluated whether we should continue to promote that as our #1 choice. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
