On Thursday, 11 September 2008 at 08:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >On Wednesday, 10 September 2008 at 20:42, Seth Vidal wrote: > > >>unless we bite the bullet and stop falling back on being able to do > >>everything from the rpm interface. > > > >-1 > > > >Fedora doesn't need to go where Suse already is. > > Instead of voting, it would be better, if you can explain why it is > wrong in your opinion. +1/-1 doesn't really convey much useful > information to assign any weight in a debate. I believe it is the one who proposes the change that has to explain why it is necessary and can't be done in any other way. It has already been said why it is wrong in this thread: people still use rpm command to install packages. Is there a very good reason to force them to use yum instead? Yum is still slower than plain rpm. After all, it is a frontend and I do not think forcing people to use frontends is a good idea when the tool behind the frontend can do the job just as well. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
