On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:16 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:14 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Here's a proof of concept plugin: > > > > > > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/post-transaction-actions/ > > > > Ok cool - with one small fix to the plugin, this simple action: > > > > > Thank you, I've applied this to the one I uploaded above. > > So this seems to work - now the question is - should we push for this to > go into rpm instead? Absolutely. If it's going to exist at all, it needs to be in rpm. Otherwise this and the corresponding rpm changes fail the litmus test of "will my system be the same if I download the rpm(2) and run the transaction manually using rpm as it is if I use yum to install the rpm". Any time you fail that litmus test, you've put the code in the wrong place (at least IMO). -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
