Re: Using rpm for incremental development builds?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad <at> users.sourceforge.net> writes:
Also, it would be *really* nice to be able to build qt-copy and have it update rpm's database to "know" that I have qt4 already .

Are you aware that our qt packages include qt-copy patches and are regularly updated with the latest qt-copy patches?

Hmm, no... I guess I could look at the rpm again, but it wouldn't solve the problem for rosegarden, which needs also kdelibs (which would *not* be nearly as up-to-date as the near-daily builds I do).

OTOH, I /have/ occasionally had to patch qt, so using an rpm would make that a bit harder.

--
Matthew
Warning: This message has not been approved by the FDA.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux