> It looks like metafont failed to produce output. Maybe you're in for a > check from DEK :) > Granted, mftrace could do something less abrupt than dump a stack trace. > > warning: mf: command exited with value 32512 (ignored) > Metafont failed. Excerpt from the log file: > Odd, it's not doing this on F-9, builds fine there. Could this be an artifact of the patch fuzz change? > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I'm not familiar with lilypond, but that page you linked is 404... >> >> Sorry, typed from another monitor, and I fat-fingered it: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=789014 >> >>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I can take autotrace and mftrace. I'm about to package more font >>>>> generation tools, i.e. mf2pt1 and metatype1. But I have yet to be >>>>> sponsored, so it will take a while... >>>> >>>> Thanks Quentin! >>>> >>>> Vasile, my koji devel build of lilypond dies during an mftrace step. >>>> Do >>>> you have any insight? Might mftrace need a rebuild? A newer version >>>> is >>>> available anyway. . . >>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskingo?taskID=789014 >>>> >>>>> fig2ps should probably be left in the cold, there much better options >>>>> for making drawings in/for LaTeX these days. Besides the rpm dates >>>>> back to fc7. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Deji Akingunola >>>>> <dakingun@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Quentin Spencer <qspencer@xxxxxxxx> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> It's becoming clear to me that I lack the time to maintain all of >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> packages, as there are a few outstanding bug reports that I'm just >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> getting to. I think it's time to hand off some or all of my >>>>>>> packages >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> new >>>>>>> maintainers. The following is the list of my current packages. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> atlas >>>>>>> autotrace >>>>>>> cln >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll take 'atlas' and 'cln' . >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Deji >>>>>> >>>>>>> fig2ps >>>>>>> fftw >>>>>>> ginac >>>>>>> glpk >>>>>>> lilypond >>>>>>> lilypond-doc >>>>>>> mftrace >>>>>>> octave >>>>>>> octave-forge >>>>>>> suitesparse >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some of these are really easy, but two of them could be somewhat >>>>>>> challenging. Octave-forge is getting big and ugly, and it really >>>>>>> needs >>>>>>> to be >>>>>>> split into about 40 subpackages (which could be done incrementally, >>>>>>> rather >>>>>>> than all at once). Atlas is more or less working but it is really >>>>>>> outdated, >>>>>>> and it would probably require almost starting from scratch to >>>>>>> package >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> new 3.8.x releases. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Quentin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> fedora-devel-list mailing list >>>>>>> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> fedora-devel-list mailing list >>>>>> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> fedora-devel-list mailing list >>>>> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> novus ordo absurdum >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> novus ordo absurdum >> >> > -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list