Michel Salim wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bryan O'Sullivan <bos <at> serpentine.com> writes:
There are periodic threads about how pushing the new hotness to a
stable release is a bad idea. This seems like a clear-cut case of why.
I can understand the fellow's desire to package his window manager,
but why can't it wait until F10?
We'll also need cmake 2.6 to push KDE 4.2 ~6 months from now. And there's more
and more stuff requiring 2.6 already (which is why the upgrade was requested in
the first place). So IMHO the sooner it gets into F9, the better.
Will KDE 4.2 be pushed into F-9, though? I understand the rationale
for upgrading F-9's KDE to 4.1, but 4.2?
Speaking of... where *is* KDE 4.1 for F9? Is it not in the system yet?
All I see seems to be 4.0.5.
--
Matthew
Person A: It's an ISO standard.
Person B: ...And that means what?
--mal (http://theangryadmin.blogspot.com/2008/04/future.html)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
