Re: Pushing cmake 2.6 to F9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Yes, I object. It has some substantial incompatibilities with cmake
2.4.8 that break some of the software I work on (Second Life). The
bugs in question are fixed in 2.6.1, but I don't think it would be a
good idea to build and push that, either: you'll break *someone*
unexpectedly, and they won't be reading this list until it's too late.


2.6.1 is what would be pushed.  The request is here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459243

At some point we're going to be holding back new stuff more than we are breaking existing stuff, but I don't know when that point will be. 2.6.X has been in rawhide since Mar 28 so it's been beaten on for a while.

Any other comments?

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux