2008/8/14 Nils Philippsen <nils@xxxxxxxxxx>: [..] > Well, we're not in the military here, but IMO the term AWOL is fitting > insofar as you can grant your own leave rather easily by notifying the > rest of us about it. Not doing so could be considered a "breach of > duty", if you bear in mind that duty here is something different than > duty in uniform. > > I don't really care about what term we use to designate non-responsive > maintainers, but it should be "harsh" enough so that people are aware of > the consequences of it. > [..] This got moved to important discussion but basic question/aim for mail remained unanswered. My review for 2.2.61 update has been APPROVED and I am added as co-maintainer for this package. All steps mentioned here have been followed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers The concerned request is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447125 So what next ? I suppose this needs a look by anybody from FESco members. Thanks, -- Regards, Rakesh Pandit -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
