On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:42:01 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Imho in case there is a renaming of an policy, the cause should be also > explained in the page. Non-native speakers may not be able to know the > reasons for such a renaming without it beeing documented. For me 'AWOL' did > not imply anything negative. Robin has tried to explain it. The negative thing about it is that its commonly used for cases of absence _without permission_. Not just in a military context. It's used when somebody ought not be away, and being away would be considered a _breach of duty_. Being "non-responsive" is not a good thing either, but its meaning is less harsh. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
