Re: Looking for new package owners

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> It's becoming clear to me that I lack the time to maintain all of my
> packages, as there are a few outstanding bug reports that I'm just not
> getting to. I think it's time to hand off some or all of my packages to
> new maintainers. The following is the list of my current packages.
>
> atlas
> autotrace
> cln
> fig2ps
> fftw
> ginac
> glpk
> lilypond
> lilypond-doc

I could take lilypond*, if no one else has a burning desire. . .

> mftrace
> octave
> octave-forge
> suitesparse
>
> Some of these are really easy, but two of them could be somewhat
> challenging. Octave-forge is getting big and ugly, and it really needs
> to be split into about 40 subpackages (which could be done
> incrementally, rather than all at once). Atlas is more or less working
> but it is really outdated, and it would probably require almost starting
> from scratch to package the new 3.8.x releases.
>
> Quentin
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux