> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:50:27AM -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: >> It doesn't seem seem like a good idea to update a package that can >> cause some major ABI/API breakage only 2 weeks before the Beta freeze, >> without evaluating the fallout from potential broken deps. This >> really should have been not only announced, but discussed before doing >> the soname bump. > > Ok, I can see I've screwed on several levels here (underestimating how > many packages depend on boost, not realizing how far into release > cycle Fedora is). So I can have boost un-tagged by releng right away, > and break the next rawhide to come. So no need for purely boost-related rebuilds at this time? > Still, while I see some big packages (abiword, inkscape), I suspect > that most incompatibilities can be fixed simply (i.e. mostly sed-style > fixes), and I can help people with fixing their build failures > (attaching Miro patch right away). > > PM > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
