On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:32:39AM -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: > Looks like this change: > > > boost-1.36.0-0.1.beta1.fc10 --------------------------- * Mon Aug 11 > > 18:00:00 2008 Petr Machata <pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.36.0-0.1.beta1 > > - Rebase to 1.36.0.beta1 - Drop boost-regex.patch and portions of > > boost-gcc43.patch, port the rest - Automate SONAME tracking and bump > > SONAME to 4 - Adjust boost-configure.patch to include > > threading=single,multi explicitly > > Created a ton of broken deps (below). Are we supposed to rebuild > everything or is this a packaging error? Yes, I've bumped a soname. In general, with boost updates there is no guarantee of backwards compatibility. > If a rebuild is required, I wish people could get into the habit of > pre-announcing these kind of soname bumps, especially one's that > impact a huge number of packages. Maintainers need to be aware of the > impact that their package might have on other dependent packages... My mistake, I should have done that. I'll remember to do it next time. PM
Attachment:
pgpLz4zGTzXy5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
