On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Igor Pires Soares <igorsoares@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is one of my concerns. I'm creating a BrOffice.org LiveCD spin > which is waiting approval from the spin SIG. It could fit the case, but > we will still have the same problem with the official DVD Installation > Media. Let me state it a little more firmly... we need to know what the actual legal bar to meet is. If having openoffice.org available at install time..for anyone in Brazil is a problem..then we'll have to stop distributing the normal dvd in Brazil... it very well may turn out that nothing short of that will suffice. If the language specific hacks to hide OpenOffice.org for just pt_BR users at install time do not meet the legal requirement...then we shouldn't waste time with the hacks in comps. It doesn't matter if it seems reasonable to me or to you to do language specific changes because it will work for "most" people..the trademark law which you are trying to work around may not see it as reasonable and that is what matters. Having a technical solution which works for the vast majority of the people in Brazil...may not be enough. We may need to find a solution which is guaranteed to meet the legal requirement no matter how a user in Brazil interacts with the install media. What does the law in Brazil need us to do? We must have an understanding as to what the actual legal bar to meet is and put resources in place to meet that requirement. If that means a special Brazilian install media..which doesn't include openoffice.org branded binaries at all..then we need to know so we can deal with that. and not pretend otherwise. -jef"not hopeful"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
