On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 09:59 +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > Well, I think it's always better to use common sense rather than > blindly follow any policy. And common sense to me says fix the package before the next freeze deadline, rather than waiting for some cursory nod from the owner. > > > agree that it is a good idea. I am sure there are good reasons, > > specially when there's an active developer wanting to do some work > on > > it. > > Our CVS (usually -- depends on pkg.acl) is open. Nobody has to wait. > Go ahead and contribute. Maybe for your packages, but certainly not every Fedora package. A goodly number of them have overly restrictive permissions set (something I'm trying to address), and many will likely continue to have restrictive permissions set on them. Anything less than 3 weeks is far far to long to fit in with Fedora's release cycle. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
