On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > *Stupid* policy. 2 weeks is really not too much. Would probably be interesting to think what happened to make people agree that it is a good idea. I am sure there are good reasons, specially when there's an active developer wanting to do some work on it. If/when the original packager comes back, if the newcomer's been doing a good job, there should not be much to regret really. In theory anyway :-) Collaborative package maintainership makes this much *much* easier to handle, avoiding people getting too attached to the ownership of the package. Without it, it's always too short or two long... cheers, m -- martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
