Poppler's spec does this:
%build
pushd %{name}-%{version}
# despair
sed -i s/qt3/qt-3.3/g configure
%configure \
--disable-static \
--enable-cairo-output \
--enable-poppler-qt \
--enable-poppler-qt4 \
--enable-xpdf-headers
make %{?_smp_mflags}
popd
Is this not good enough for some reason?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:39:49AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
>>> Michel Salim wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Some upstream developers recommend that their software (thinking of LLVM
>>>> and PLT Scheme, but there must be others) *not* be configured and built
>>>> at the top-level source directory (typically recommending using build/,
>>>> object/ or some such).
>>>>
>>>> When this is needed, currently the Fedora packager has to revert to
>>>> calling the configure script directly, foregoing the %configure macro,
>>>> and copying as much of the configure settings by hand. Would it be a
>>>> desirable feature to, say, be able to declare
>>>>
>>>> %define configure_relative_path
>
>> I'd really rather see something like [this] suggestion.
>
> Agreed. Filed as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/458644
>
> [This is suitable to be submitted upstream, but rpm.org does not have
> a bug tracker, it features only lists, and I did not care to
> subscribe before cc'ing this mail, so I guess my chanced to get
> heared there are low. They read fedora bugzilla, though. ;-) ]
>
> Stepan Kasal
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
>
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
