-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michel Salim wrote: > Hi all, > > Some upstream developers recommend that their software (thinking of LLVM > and PLT Scheme, but there must be others) *not* be configured and built > at the top-level source directory (typically recommending using build/, > object/ or some such). > > When this is needed, currently the Fedora packager has to revert to > calling the configure script directly, foregoing the %configure macro, > and copying as much of the configure settings by hand. Would it be a > desirable feature to, say, be able to declare > Thanks to Michael and Mamoru -- should these be listed in our packaging guidelines? - -- Michel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhex5UACgkQWt0J3fd+7ZAQAgCeMIJcla7PVON/3jx4i25ILcOM ebMAoJB+rstX/gFaiNe5+EKEfTOzLfdY =l/bp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
