Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 18:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
At the last meeting FESCo decided they didn't feel it was necessary to
review the SIGs as Features unless the Spin SIG/owner and rel-eng
couldn't agree.
Just sent it to rel-eng.
This ping-pong doesn't help. FESCo should really decide if spins are
features are not. Take input from rel-eng if necessary but please make a
decision either way.
They did make a decision. They decided that they aren't Features in the
sense that FESCo doesn't need to review them unless there is a problem
that needs to be escalated. Just like every other group/scenario we
have.
Rel-Eng has the approval authority for Spins. They want them treated as
Features (as does the Spins SIG last I knew), so the only thing that is
different is the approving body. There is no ping-ponging. Rel-eng
just wanted to make sure FESCo didn't want to be the approving body.
Does this mean, they would be in the feature list or not? If not, what
is the approval process for rel-eng to consider them for approval?
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
